Indirect systems also have an inherent capacity limit, which impacts the volume of hot water available for various processes. This can cause line speed slow‐downs during production, and full stops during high‐demand periods such as third‐shift cleaning and washdown.
The challenge of operating efficiently is further exacerbated by hard water scaling, which is caused by hard mineral deposits falling out of the solution as water temperatures increase. Scaling is counterproductive, as it insulates the water from heat transfer, while also causing system pumps to work harder to circulate water.
The presence of scaling is a challenge for all types of heat exchange systems, but removing it is particularly cumbersome within the intricate design of the tube bundles or plates used in common indirect heat exchange designs. Direct Steam Injection (DSI) Systems are easier to keep clean with routine maintenance; because DSI heat transfer surfaces are minimal, and they also offer less opportunity for scaling buildup.
In addition, the design of DSI Systems enables tight temperature control, instantaneous and rapid responsiveness to flow changes and consistent capacity levels — resulting in greater efficiency and lower maintenance expenditures overall.
Steam hammer
Despite the advantages of a DSI system, not all units are created equal.
An important design consideration is the management of condensation, which is naturally produced as steam is mixed with water. Rapid changes can cause this process to become rough and inconsistent, producing bubbles of uncondensed steam. As they encounter cold pipe walls, the bubbles collapse; this results in vibration and noise, also known as steam hammer. The problem is more than a mere annoyance, as it can create damaging cavitation to tank walls and piping — which, in turn, increases the likelihood of leakage and, ultimately, equipment failure.
One strategy often suggested for mitigating steam hammer is to keep liquid flow changes gradual, which allows the system’s temperature control loop time to respond. This is not necessarily practical in the real world, however. Pick Heaters developed its variable flow heater to take a more proactive approach: It responds automatically with precise temperature control suitable to a wide range of changes in both pressure and flow. The system also compensates for low‐flow conditions, intermittent use and idle periods, each of which can impact responsiveness.
Another design strategy to work around the issue of steam hammer is using sonic velocity to ensure rapid mixing and condensation. However, this approach requires forceful condensation of steam into the water stream, which presents the very condition it attempts to address. It also requires downstream piping to accommodate high flow velocities of both water and steam, increasing noise and adding to system cost. A variable flow system, by contrast, functions with low velocity and low noise, harnessing energy in the heater body and eliminating the need for straight‐run downstream piping.